|
|
|||||||
| Engine Technology From the novices to the pros, talk about engine technology. Moderated by David Vizard, professional engine developer and well-known technical writer. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
all the photos shown have large squish area? will the groove work on smaller squish areas? the heads i use i asume are fairly effecient as they dont require alot of timing say 28deg
Last edited by GMH326ci; 01-10-2008 at 04:21 PM. |
|
|||
|
Here's pictures of one of the groove layouts I have been toying
with lately. I have a couple of engines running with these, this is my first look after run time. ![]()
Last edited by automotivebreath; 01-10-2008 at 10:34 PM. |
|
|||
|
I did back to back grooves testing on my dyno.
Enigne Dyno Grooves Testing For what it's worth this guy took the before and after grooves sound files and analyzed them; The Groovy Sounds of a 360 Magnum Engine I made a large mistake by not nailing down BSFC with steady state tests - I will do that next time. Also I'm planning on recording engine noise with a contact microphone setup and maybe a knock sensor to see if the grooves actually cut down on detonation. I'm very slow though so it might not happen for a while. For the first time I understand how grooves aimed at the exhaust valve might help inhibit reversion. Did that car have a full exhaust? It's not too hard to build engines that will not have reversion at WOT anyway, when the VE goes over 100% some of that VE can be airflow that is not "trapped" and is blowing right through the engine thus there could be little or no WOT reversion. So using grooves to limit reversion at idle or low RPM/low throttle would limit their effectiveness at doing anything good at WOT right? (Thinking) - if there is no reversion at WOT why waste the groove for reversion control? ![]() I'm wondering if for detonation control groove(s) should be aimed at the outside of the intake valve where the intake valve meets the cylinder wall as this seems to be where detonation starts. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
This car runs open headers, 11:1 compression premium Exxon gas. The reason I tried the grooves pointing towards the exhaust was to direct squish action in the hot area where the flame develops, aganst the grain of swirl generated in cylinder flow. I didn't consider reversion. ![]() Quote:
show signs of detonation, I'll check the piston tops for damage. The plugs were running snow white with a slightly rich Air/fuel ratio, no signs of speckles.
Last edited by automotivebreath; 01-11-2008 at 11:19 PM. |
|
||||
|
Hi,
I put burn slots in the squish area of my first cylinder head recently. Unfortunately I have no photos of the work as my camera was not working. Basically the engine spec remained the same except for this work. I put one slot on the squish pad at the opposite side of the chamber from the spark plug pointing at the spark plug and I put one behind the spark plug which was tangential to the edge of the spark plug. I have no before and after dyno results but the feedback from the driver is that the idle is much smoother and the ability of the engine to pull from low revs is much improved. A dead spot most likely caused by bad carburettor setup has virtually disappeared. The high rpm performance does not appear to have changed at all. I am very pleased with the results and am contemplating doing it on future builds. Unfortunately this is more anecdotal evidence with no real numbers to back it but all I have for the moment .Best Regards Tom |
|
||||
|
Hi,
The engine is Ford Pinto 2.0l sohc engine that is fitted to a Ford Escort Mark2 road rally car. The spec of the engine is not massive. It is running 10.5:1 static compression ratio, 285 degree cam, twin side draft weber 48 carburettors. The head has bathtub chamber with the spark plug pointing towards the inlet valve and in the direct path of the incoming charge. The following is a photo of it in the early stages of home porting. Regards Tom |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|