Go Back   GoFastNews.com - All Racing News All the Time! > Performance Racing Forum > Engine Technology

Engine Technology From the novices to the pros, talk about engine technology. Moderated by David Vizard, professional engine developer and well-known technical writer.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51 (permalink)  
Old 01-09-2008, 08:47 PM
big block fiero's Avatar
Tire Changer
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 131
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calypso View Post
Do I read this correct that you have found that radiusing the squish pad edges and using groove together has proven beneficial on your dyno?
Not radiusing the squish pad edges and using a groove together has shown positive results. Our focus over the last 5 months was been racing and not development . I know that proper A,B,A testing would help our racing program but we often make more then one change which spoils the test. I,m not the one making these poor decisions and I'm told that we don't have time for testing now but will find time to do this testing my way later. I have been putting various technologies in our engines without A,B,A testing and have always seen hp improvements. We have never yet lost power with any of my changes so wildman SR has gotten comfortable with the idea that this is easier then it really is. When the opportunity arises I will do the proper testing and report on the results. I have a situation that may very soon give me the ability to test every idea and concept anyday and everyday so it could get real interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #52 (permalink)  
Old 01-09-2008, 09:10 PM
Tire Changer
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 164
I feel a case of dyno-envy coming on . . . way to go!!!
Reply With Quote
  #53 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2008, 06:17 AM
Garage Sweeper
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 9
all the photos shown have large squish area? will the groove work on smaller squish areas? the heads i use i asume are fairly effecient as they dont require alot of timing say 28deg

Last edited by GMH326ci; 01-10-2008 at 04:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #54 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2008, 10:32 PM
Oil Changer
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Southern Louisiana
Posts: 423
Here's pictures of one of the groove layouts I have been toying
with lately. I have a couple of engines running with these, this
is my first look after run time.




Last edited by automotivebreath; 01-10-2008 at 10:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #55 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2008, 11:02 PM
crazyman's Avatar
Garage Sweeper
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northeastern Illinois
Posts: 45
Looks like melted aluminum specks. Did it sound like it spark knocked?

In theory, you are blowing the heat from the exhaust valve into the vapor. I wonder how it would've looked blowing the vapor towards the exhaust valve.
Reply With Quote
  #56 (permalink)  
Old 01-11-2008, 11:39 AM
Garage Sweeper
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 4
I did back to back grooves testing on my dyno.

Enigne Dyno Grooves Testing

For what it's worth this guy took the before and after grooves sound files and analyzed them;

The Groovy Sounds of a 360 Magnum Engine

I made a large mistake by not nailing down BSFC with steady state tests - I will do that next time. Also I'm planning on recording engine noise with a contact microphone setup and maybe a knock sensor to see if the grooves actually cut down on detonation. I'm very slow though so it might not happen for a while.

For the first time I understand how grooves aimed at the exhaust valve might help inhibit reversion. Did that car have a full exhaust? It's not too hard to build engines that will not have reversion at WOT anyway, when the VE goes over 100% some of that VE can be airflow that is not "trapped" and is blowing right through the engine thus there could be little or no WOT reversion.

So using grooves to limit reversion at idle or low RPM/low throttle would limit their effectiveness at doing anything good at WOT right?

(Thinking) - if there is no reversion at WOT why waste the groove for reversion control?

I'm wondering if for detonation control groove(s) should be aimed at the outside of the intake valve where the intake valve meets the cylinder wall as this seems to be where detonation starts.
__________________
Jesse Lackman
RevSearch
Reply With Quote
  #57 (permalink)  
Old 01-11-2008, 11:06 PM
Oil Changer
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Southern Louisiana
Posts: 423
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesse Lackman View Post

For the first time I understand how grooves aimed at the exhaust valve might
help inhibit reversion.

Did that car have a full exhaust?

So using grooves to limit reversion at idle or low RPM/low throttle would limit
their effectiveness at doing anything good at WOT right?

(Thinking) - if there is no reversion at WOT why waste the groove for reversion
control?
.
How would the grooves aimed at the exhaust valve help with reversion?

This car runs open headers, 11:1 compression premium Exxon gas. The reason
I tried the grooves pointing towards the exhaust was to direct squish action
in the hot area where the flame develops, aganst the grain of swirl generated
in cylinder flow. I didn't consider reversion.




Quote:
Originally Posted by crazyman View Post
Looks like melted aluminum specks. Did it sound like it spark knocked?
I'm thinking the roughness on the piston is from high humidity. The engine didn't
show signs of detonation, I'll check the piston tops for damage. The plugs
were running snow white with a slightly rich Air/fuel ratio, no signs of speckles.


Last edited by automotivebreath; 01-11-2008 at 11:19 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #58 (permalink)  
Old 01-24-2008, 12:31 PM
tommurphy73's Avatar
Garage Sweeper
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 46
Hi,

I put burn slots in the squish area of my first cylinder head recently. Unfortunately I have no photos of the work as my camera was not working. Basically the engine spec remained the same except for this work. I put one slot on the squish pad at the opposite side of the chamber from the spark plug pointing at the spark plug and I put one behind the spark plug which was tangential to the edge of the spark plug. I have no before and after dyno results but the feedback from the driver is that the idle is much smoother and the ability of the engine to pull from low revs is much improved. A dead spot most likely caused by bad carburettor setup has virtually disappeared. The high rpm performance does not appear to have changed at all. I am very pleased with the results and am contemplating doing it on future builds. Unfortunately this is more anecdotal evidence with no real numbers to back it but all I have for the moment.

Best Regards
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #59 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2008, 07:02 PM
Oil Changer
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Southern Louisiana
Posts: 423
Hi Tom,
Thanks for the information. Can you provide details of the engine
and application?
Reply With Quote
  #60 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2008, 08:31 PM
tommurphy73's Avatar
Garage Sweeper
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 46
Hi,

The engine is Ford Pinto 2.0l sohc engine that is fitted to a Ford Escort Mark2 road rally car. The spec of the engine is not massive. It is running 10.5:1 static compression ratio, 285 degree cam, twin side draft weber 48 carburettors. The head has bathtub chamber with the spark plug pointing towards the inlet valve and in the direct path of the incoming charge. The following is a photo of it in the early stages of home porting.



Regards
Tom
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright ©2007 - 2008 GoFastNews.com LLC