Go Back   GoFastNews.com - All Racing News All the Time! > Performance Racing Forum > Engine Technology

Engine Technology From the novices to the pros, talk about engine technology. Moderated by David Vizard, professional engine developer and well-known technical writer.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-03-2008, 10:13 PM
Garage Sweeper
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6
Big heads are okay with a small cam - but why?

I have read a couple times now that you can 'get away' with having heads that are too big for your engine if you keep the cam duration reasonably short. Can anyone confirm if this is true and explain why? Or any examples would be great.

The reason that I ask is that cylinder heads are expensive so I only want to buy them once. Cam's are cheap so I could afford to experiment a little. I want to buy heads that I can grow into as my engine evolves in who knows what direction.

Combo is a 302ci Ford and I am looking at the Trick Flow high ports (190cc inlet IIRC). May end up as a turbo 347, but that could be years away.

Thanks

Last edited by 302tt; 10-03-2008 at 11:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-03-2008, 11:15 PM
rookie's Avatar
Pit Crew
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: In The Woods
Posts: 570
Even with a small cam you can hurt power with too much port volume, check out this article and #8 also.

Porting School #7 - Power & Port Volumes
__________________
Has anything you've done made your life better?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-04-2008, 09:05 PM
Garage Sweeper
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6
Thank for the link - it was a good read, but it did not say much about how the optimum head selection might be a function of the cam duration.

If there is less time to fill the cylinder then the velocity must be higher with a short cam so you would need a bigger head. Right?

For example, in the article the cam duration was 224 degrees at 0.050" and the best head looked to be the one with 200 cc intake volume. If the cam duration was 10% less (202 degrees at 0.050") might the optimum head have been 10% larger (220 cc) to keep the velocity about the same?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-04-2008, 09:17 PM
rookie's Avatar
Pit Crew
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: In The Woods
Posts: 570
My understanding in that situation is that the valve would close before the bigger head would reach max velocity and cause fuel fall out and poor atomization.

It would be better to opt on the side of the smaller head and save $ for porting at a later date if you wish to increase power later.

Big heads always make for a lazy motor and that’s not good in a street/strip combo.

All out race Big head, Big cam and spin the $#!+ out of it.
__________________
Has anything you've done made your life better?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-04-2008, 09:20 PM
rookie's Avatar
Pit Crew
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: In The Woods
Posts: 570
Here is another where Dusty made 580 horse with a 195 AFR head.

Product Review #4 AFR 195 Comp Eliminator Heads
__________________
Has anything you've done made your life better?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-04-2008, 10:05 PM
Oil Changer
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 290
Here is a link related to this thread:

PipeMax Simulation of SAM 400 EMC - Speed Talk

Interesting reading and a good look at Larry Meaux's excellent PipeMax software.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright ©2007 - 2008 GoFastNews.com LLC