|
|
|||||||
| Engine Technology From the novices to the pros, talk about engine technology. Moderated by David Vizard, professional engine developer and well-known technical writer. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
I like the cushion you have in your p-v clearance. Thats the target(ish) I try for.
Where is your cam installed at? Here is a Reher/Morrison site for some reading. There are some about gas porting. I'll let you decide. Also a good one about compression. New Page 1 rmre start rmre start This will get you started. Theres alot of good reading there. Some of it supports what I'm saying. I've had some good teachers for building some hp. It wasn't R/M but they were Prostock champs a few years. If you could post some pics of the domes of your pistons here I'd like to see them please. Before cleaning. Thanks , Don Last edited by want-a-be; 07-23-2008 at 10:50 PM. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
that you might be interested in ? ? ? and here's a Pic of a relatively stock 1987 Chevy S-10 Blazer ![]() this SBC 434cid was installed in Danny Durand's 1987 Chevy S10 Blazer, much sleeker and setup for DragRacing than that above Pic. Danny's S-10 Blazer has custom paint job-> mainly Black, with shades of Yellow,Magenta,Green,Orange,and Silver PowerGlide Trans 1.82 1st 4.86 Rear Gears Marv Ripes 8" Converter 16x33 Slicks 3200+ Lbs w/Danny driving No Problem Dragstrip , October 2007 Danny ran just on Motor , No NOS 9.440 ET and 142+ MPH best ET so far on 200 HP NOS ran 8.830 ET and 156 MPH the 1987 Chevy S10 Blazer has a Frontal Area of = 29.112 SqFt but in ET_Analyst , you use .80 to .85 % percent = 24.74 SqFt for input here's the ETA Model ![]() here's the SBC 434cid Engine modeled in PipeMax
|
|
|||
|
KillaCamaro and AutomotiveBreath,
you both might have seen Danny Durand's S10 Blazer run a few Passes at No Problem Raceway ? ? ? here's the actual Dyno Data on the SBC434 ![]() here's the Dyno Graph ![]() here's the Dyno Test Description
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
I remember seeing the Blazer but didn't see it run. I really should spend less time in the pits and more time watching, you never know what you're missing. I have been following this thread, big CI small blocks are getting popular at NPR. Any comments on KillaCamaro's 12.8:1 compression? Many of the 434's I'm seeing are running the compression much higher. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() either i misunderstood KillaCamaro's CR question or he misunderstood my answer ? i definetly don't remember advising him that there would be no more HP and TQ to gain from increasing CR !!! i would advise him to run at least 14:1 CR and upwards we've tried as high as 16.7 to 16.8:1 on Craigs A/ND and we currently run 16.2:1 CR on Jeff Colletta's NPS BBC632 1322HP / 1640's on Legal NOS jet Video of Jeff_Colletta_BC632_1316-HP - Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting --------------------------------------------- both our SBC434's are'nt too far away from each other in Part's Specs, but i'm wondering why Killa's 434 is Peaking so low in RPM ?? with the same Dart Pro-1's ? it seems there's a severe CSA speed problem ! the Dart Pro-1's on Danny's 434 are the best i can do without welding pushrod areas up + widening the pushrod pinch. We're making Peak HP @ 7500 and Peak TQ @ 6300 RPM there's more HP there welding those Heads and on Dany's 434 it really need a pair of larger Headers, but we used what he already had. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
getting at the pinch with out welding and widening? |
|
|||
|
Quote:
i'm "maxing-out" that area...its just i didn't weldup Danny's Dart Pro-1's and widened that area even further ! i'm going as far as i can enlargeing the Pushrod Pinch "without" resorting to offset Rockers/Lifters and without Welding or Epoxy. i've made myself a few Custom metal thickness checkers about 30+ years ago, and they work great as you never breakout thru pushrod sides and if your careful you can maintain wall thickness in that area to around .040" ...then you attack the Port's Center divider wall for the rest of the CSA. But i'm also sure Killa's has a speed problem on the Short Turn Curve and in the Transition from the Bowl to the Chamber as well for the HP and RPM point to be so low. if i plugged in the Data into PipeMax it wouldn't Model his Engine correctly, it would show its no where near accessing the FlowBench Flow he has. That's the first Tip-off there's a CSA speed/Choke problem(s) |
|
|||
|
Yes I understood that you did what you could with in the constraints with
out cutting through and going the offset rocker route. . I did a set of 215 pro 1's with a 2.05" valve for a 355 a while back. Long story short the bottom end broke and the heads ended up on a 434 much like whats being described here. Everybody said it wouldn't run because of the heads but surprisingly it's been 9.4's, it says a lot for the little darts. To put things in perspective, the car weighs 2800 lbs and is fairly aerodynamic; so I'm sure he's leaving plenty on the table. Anyway I'm telling him he needs to get the heads redone, I reading up on this to see what others are doing, I'm all ears. I see your getting some impressive numbers, especially when you consider the size shape and weight of the Blazer. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|