|
|
|||||||
| Engine Technology From the novices to the pros, talk about engine technology. Moderated by David Vizard, professional engine developer and well-known technical writer. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Quote:
I agree with you that only in very extreme cases, F1, Prostock etc, is it worth spending so much on bottom end prep. Grumpy had it right 30 years ago that the best possible bottom end prep showed comparatively little benefit for the effort compared to head work where the difference between good and bad could easily be 100 bhp. Personally I've never had a block line bored in my life. Never seen the need. Never used a torque plate either. When you look at how out-of-round wet liner engine liners go after a few miles without apparently affecting cranking pressure or power you begin to wonder if piston rings are really that fussed about sealing to something with a minute amount of ovality. I've pulled apart Peugeot engines with 4 thou ovality on the liners (which actually disappears if you leave them on a shelf for a while for the stresses to dissipate) and they perform as well as iron block variants running the same tuning bits. I think on small engines such as we use over here you're hard pushed to spot the differences on a dyno between best possible and 'decent' bottom end prep. On a 700 bhp V8 it's easier to see them but in percentage terms they're still negligible. If 1 or 2 bhp is worth $1000 to you then by all means go the whole hog. Dave |
|
|||
|
If you're going to the expense of main studs,is it not false economy to NOT align hone? Presumably, you are using studs because you will be running at increased output or at least high output for prolonged periods.
Then, wouldn't you want to ensure that you have proper bearing crush by align honing with the studs in place? Also, wouldn't you want a smooth finish on the saddles ensure the best contact with the bearings and transfer the most heat? I guess it depends on what you are building |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Last time I installed main studs, I torqued down the OEM bolts, measured the bore, pulled them out, installed the ARP studs, torqued them down, measured the bore and there was NO difference. Maybe just lucky with that block. thnx, jack vines |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Did you torque the studs the same as the bolts or did you follow ARP's instructions? How accurate were your measurements? I don't mean to take a hostile tone, but if you never needed to align-hone a block, I think this process would have went out years ago along with knurling valve guides and pistons |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Also what is the correct way to measure main bearing housing alignment? A straight edge and feeler gages or surface plate and height gage, other? |
|
||||
|
Quote:
I don't think he was saying line honing the block wasn't needed. Nor was I. Just that he didn't see any Difference in his test. Of which I have tried myself several times. AFTER line honing the block with bolts I did the stud test and saw no difference in the measurement. Also...I have line honed a block with the studs and installed bolts just to see what happens...checked the same. I use a dial bore gauge with the .0001 graduations. I'm a huge advocate of line honing...even on my stock stuff. After the blocks season they need gone through. Just like the valve job does on new heads. Don |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
thnx, jack vines |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|